GOP lawmakers reversing their positions on fertility treatments are challenged over their voting histories
Due to their voting records, Republican senators who have changed their stances on fertility treatments are under criticism.
The Alabama Supreme Court effectively ruled that human embryos are utilized in some in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures, which could expose prospective parents and healthcare providers to potentially catastrophic legal action.
Republicans consistently tried to reject it, indicating that they thought it may be a problem during election season.
Consistently a Trump supporter, Republican Representative Nancy Mace declared on Saturday that “I will stop any and all efforts to ban IVF.” The social networking platform swiftly sent her a community note stating that she “sponsored HR1011, a bill that enshrines in law the same personhood from conception argument that was used to ban IVF in Alabama.”
The note said, “Whether she knew or not, she has de facto supported such a ban.”
In reaction, Kim Masters, editor-at-large for The Hollywood Reporter, stated, “You can’t get an abortion because you’re pregnant with toxic ideology.”
Alisha Heng, a former employee of the Hill, also spoke on Saturday:
Does Nancy Mace grow weary of lying eventually? Nancy previously co-sponsored the Life at Conception Act, which posed a threat to in vitro fertilization. #SC01″
“I think it’s absolutely wild that mainstream media outlets are giving republicans the benefit of the doubt on IVF,” she stated. “If you voted against protecting it, you shouldn’t get credit for a few lame statements now.”
Rep. Mike Rogers stated on social media that he opposes “any and all efforts to restrict access to IVF” while having sponsored four legislation that would have the same outcome as the Alabama verdict. Jong-Fast supplied a screen grab of Rogers’ remarks. Likewise, despite co-sponsoring the Life at Conception Act, which excluded provisions for IVF, Rep. Michelle Steel said that IVF enabled her to begin her family (screenshot).
